Belgium vs Sao Tome and Principe: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Belgium
0 ha
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
0 ha
in 2024
Belgium rank
141st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
141st
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Belgium
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 141st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 221 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.17 ha | 0 ha | 56.17 ha | Belgium |
| 2010s | 105.56 ha | 2.14 ha | 103.42 ha | Belgium |
| 2020s | 25.85 ha | 4.27 ha | 21.58 ha | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Belgium or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Belgium, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Belgium and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 ha, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Belgium ranks 141st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 141st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.