Chile vs Egypt: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Chile
42,420 ha
in 2024
Egypt
39,357 ha
in 2024
Chile rank
72nd
Egypt rank
73rd
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Chile
- Egypt
How they compare
Chile currently reports 42,420 ha against 39,357 ha in Egypt, a difference of 3,063 ha.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 72nd and Egypt ranks 73rd of 221 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 39,598 ha | 4,063 ha | 35,534 ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 31,122 ha | 139.49 ha | 30,983 ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 72,834 ha | 2,570 ha | 70,264 ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 55,752 ha | 30,227 ha | 25,524 ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Chile or Egypt?
- Chile, at 42,420 ha against 39,357 ha in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Chile and Egypt?
- 3,063 ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Egypt?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Egypt rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Chile ranks 72nd and Egypt ranks 73rd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.