Cuba vs Ecuador: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Cuba
66,712 ha
in 2024
Ecuador
67,595 ha
in 2024
Cuba rank
67th
Ecuador rank
66th
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Cuba
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 67,595 ha against 66,712 ha in Cuba, a difference of 883 ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 67th and Ecuador ranks 66th of 221 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49,945 ha | 16,061 ha | 33,884 ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 76,217 ha | 18,449 ha | 57,768 ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 53,906 ha | 26,938 ha | 26,968 ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 90,994 ha | 41,169 ha | 49,825 ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Cuba or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 67,595 ha against 66,712 ha in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Cuba and Ecuador?
- 883 ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Ecuador?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Ecuador rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Cuba ranks 67th and Ecuador ranks 66th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.