Cuba vs North Macedonia: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Cuba
66,712 ha
in 2024
North Macedonia
61,694 ha
in 2024
Cuba rank
67th
North Macedonia rank
68th
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Cuba
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 66,712 ha against 61,694 ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 5,018 ha.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 67th and North Macedonia ranks 68th of 221 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 46,319 ha | 4,631 ha | 41,688 ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 76,217 ha | 6,646 ha | 69,572 ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 53,906 ha | 8,367 ha | 45,539 ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 90,994 ha | 16,053 ha | 74,940 ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Cuba or North Macedonia?
- Cuba, at 66,712 ha against 61,694 ha in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 5,018 ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and North Macedonia rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Cuba ranks 67th and North Macedonia ranks 68th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.