Cuba vs Rwanda: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Cuba
66,712 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
50,070 ha
in 2024
Cuba rank
67th
Rwanda rank
69th
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Cuba
- Rwanda
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 66,712 ha against 50,070 ha in Rwanda, a difference of 16,642 ha.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 221 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49,945 ha | 23,738 ha | 26,207 ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 76,217 ha | 20,516 ha | 55,701 ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 53,906 ha | 35,592 ha | 18,314 ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 90,994 ha | 39,813 ha | 51,181 ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Cuba or Rwanda?
- Cuba, at 66,712 ha against 50,070 ha in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Cuba and Rwanda?
- 16,642 ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Rwanda rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Cuba ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.