Ecuador vs Pakistan: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Ecuador
67,595 ha
in 2024
Pakistan
93,261 ha
in 2024
Ecuador rank
66th
Pakistan rank
63rd
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Ecuador
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 93,261 ha against 67,595 ha in Ecuador, a difference of 25,666 ha.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 66th and Pakistan ranks 63rd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16,061 ha | 15,453 ha | 607.89 ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 18,449 ha | 18,786 ha | 337 ha | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 26,938 ha | 20,054 ha | 6,884 ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 41,169 ha | 52,502 ha | 11,333 ha | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Ecuador or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 93,261 ha against 67,595 ha in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 25,666 ha, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Pakistan rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Ecuador ranks 66th and Pakistan ranks 63rd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.