Ecuador vs Rwanda: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Ecuador
67,595 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
50,070 ha
in 2024
Ecuador rank
66th
Rwanda rank
69th
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Ecuador
- Rwanda
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 67,595 ha against 50,070 ha in Rwanda, a difference of 17,525 ha.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.4 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Ecuador ranks 66th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16,061 ha | 23,738 ha | 7,677 ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 18,449 ha | 20,516 ha | 2,066 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 26,938 ha | 35,592 ha | 8,654 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 41,169 ha | 39,813 ha | 1,356 ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Ecuador or Rwanda?
- Ecuador, at 67,595 ha against 50,070 ha in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 17,525 ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Ecuador ranks 66th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.