Eswatini vs Pakistan: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Eswatini
118,811 ha
in 2024
Pakistan
93,261 ha
in 2024
Eswatini rank
60th
Pakistan rank
63rd
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Eswatini
- Pakistan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 118,811 ha against 93,261 ha in Pakistan, a difference of 25,550 ha.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 60th and Pakistan ranks 63rd of 221 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 60,123 ha | 15,453 ha | 44,670 ha | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 59,011 ha | 18,786 ha | 40,224 ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 61,988 ha | 20,054 ha | 41,934 ha | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 59,952 ha | 52,502 ha | 7,450 ha | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Eswatini or Pakistan?
- Eswatini, at 118,811 ha against 93,261 ha in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Eswatini and Pakistan?
- 25,550 ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Pakistan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Pakistan rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Eswatini ranks 60th and Pakistan ranks 63rd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.