Greenland vs Mauritius: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Greenland
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Greenland rank
141st
Mauritius rank
141st
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Greenland
- Mauritius
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Greenland ahead.
Greenland ranks 141st and Mauritius ranks 141st of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 51.43 ha | 18.06 ha | 33.38 ha | Greenland |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 19.26 ha | 19.26 ha | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 248.6 ha | 10.7 ha | 237.89 ha | Greenland |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Greenland or Mauritius?
- Greenland, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Greenland and Mauritius?
- 0 ha, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Greenland and Mauritius rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Greenland ranks 141st and Mauritius ranks 141st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.