Grenada vs Norway: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada rank
141st
Norway rank
141st
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Grenada
- Norway
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.
Grenada ranks 141st and Norway ranks 141st of 221 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.33 ha | 1,293 ha | 1,291 ha | Norway |
| 2000s | 2.14 ha | 1,254 ha | 1,252 ha | Norway |
| 2010s | 4.28 ha | 159.71 ha | 155.43 ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Grenada or Norway?
- Grenada, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Grenada and Norway?
- 0 ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Norway rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Grenada ranks 141st and Norway ranks 141st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.