Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Hungary
279.83 ha
in 2024
Sri Lanka
256.5 ha
in 2024
Hungary rank
121st
Sri Lanka rank
123rd
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Hungary
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 279.83 ha against 256.5 ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 23.33 ha.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Hungary ranks 121st and Sri Lanka ranks 123rd of 221 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 705.19 ha | 17,176 ha | 16,471 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 2,079 ha | 36,470 ha | 34,391 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 869.73 ha | 12,923 ha | 12,054 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 572.61 ha | 3,181 ha | 2,608 ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Hungary or Sri Lanka?
- Hungary, at 279.83 ha against 256.5 ha in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Hungary and Sri Lanka?
- 23.33 ha, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Sri Lanka rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Hungary ranks 121st and Sri Lanka ranks 123rd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.