Iceland vs Israel: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Iceland
1,491 ha
in 2024
Israel
1,395 ha
in 2024
Iceland rank
108th
Israel rank
110th
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Iceland
- Israel
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1,491 ha against 1,395 ha in Israel, a difference of 96 ha.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Israel ahead.
Iceland ranks 108th and Israel ranks 110th of 221 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83.85 ha | 835.91 ha | 752.05 ha | Israel |
| 2000s | 177.7 ha | 906.84 ha | 729.13 ha | Israel |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 1,351 ha | 1,351 ha | Israel |
| 2020s | 319.72 ha | 948.19 ha | 628.47 ha | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Iceland or Israel?
- Iceland, at 1,491 ha against 1,395 ha in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Iceland and Israel?
- 96 ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Israel?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Israel rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Iceland ranks 108th and Israel ranks 110th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.