Liechtenstein vs Sweden: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Liechtenstein
0 ha
in 2024
Sweden
0 ha
in 2024
Liechtenstein rank
141st
Sweden rank
141st
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Liechtenstein
- Sweden
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Sweden, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Liechtenstein ranks 141st and Sweden ranks 141st of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Liechtenstein averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5381 ha | 411.54 ha | 411 ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 291.71 ha | 291.71 ha | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 1,518 ha | 1,518 ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 4.3 ha | 0 ha | 4.3 ha | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Liechtenstein or Sweden?
- Liechtenstein, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Liechtenstein and Sweden?
- 0 ha, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Liechtenstein and Sweden rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Liechtenstein ranks 141st and Sweden ranks 141st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.