Norway vs Puerto Rico: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0 ha
in 2024
Norway rank
141st
Puerto Rico rank
141st
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Norway
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 141st and Puerto Rico ranks 141st of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 3 and Puerto Rico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,293 ha | 68.49 ha | 1,224 ha | Norway |
| 2000s | 1,254 ha | 44.34 ha | 1,210 ha | Norway |
| 2010s | 159.71 ha | 121.97 ha | 37.74 ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 42.8 ha | 42.8 ha | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Norway or Puerto Rico?
- Norway, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Norway and Puerto Rico?
- 0 ha, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Puerto Rico?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Puerto Rico rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Norway ranks 141st and Puerto Rico ranks 141st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.