Norway vs Vanuatu: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Vanuatu
0 ha
in 2024
Norway rank
141st
Vanuatu rank
141st
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Norway
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 141st and Vanuatu ranks 141st of 221 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,293 ha | 15.86 ha | 1,277 ha | Norway |
| 2000s | 1,254 ha | 36.37 ha | 1,218 ha | Norway |
| 2010s | 159.71 ha | 38.5 ha | 121.21 ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Norway or Vanuatu?
- Norway, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Vanuatu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Norway and Vanuatu?
- 0 ha, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Vanuatu?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Vanuatu rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Norway ranks 141st and Vanuatu ranks 141st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.