Pakistan vs Philippines: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Pakistan
93,261 ha
in 2024
Philippines
89,808 ha
in 2024
Pakistan rank
63rd
Philippines rank
64th
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Pakistan
- Philippines
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 93,261 ha against 89,808 ha in Philippines, a difference of 3,453 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Philippines ahead.
Pakistan ranks 63rd and Philippines ranks 64th of 221 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,453 ha | 37,040 ha | 21,587 ha | Philippines |
| 2000s | 18,786 ha | 56,506 ha | 37,719 ha | Philippines |
| 2010s | 20,054 ha | 62,254 ha | 42,200 ha | Philippines |
| 2020s | 52,502 ha | 53,169 ha | 666.56 ha | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Pakistan or Philippines?
- Pakistan, at 93,261 ha against 89,808 ha in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Pakistan and Philippines?
- 3,453 ha, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Philippines?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Philippines rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Pakistan ranks 63rd and Philippines ranks 64th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.