Puerto Rico vs Slovenia: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Puerto Rico
0 ha
in 2024
Slovenia
0 ha
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
141st
Slovenia rank
141st
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Puerto Rico
- Slovenia
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Slovenia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 141st and Slovenia ranks 141st of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.19 ha | 69.73 ha | 2.54 ha | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 44.34 ha | 39.16 ha | 5.18 ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 121.97 ha | 77.46 ha | 44.51 ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 42.8 ha | 249.61 ha | 206.81 ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Puerto Rico or Slovenia?
- Puerto Rico, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Puerto Rico and Slovenia?
- 0 ha, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Slovenia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Puerto Rico and Slovenia rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Puerto Rico ranks 141st and Slovenia ranks 141st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.