Angola vs South Sudan: Savanna fires — Burned Area, per capita
Angola
0.9322 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
2.05 ha per person
in 2024
Angola rank
4th
South Sudan rank
2nd
Savanna fires — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Angola
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 2.05 ha per person against 0.9322 ha per person in Angola, a difference of 1.12 ha per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 2.2 times Angola's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 4th and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 188 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.16 ha per person | 2.35 ha per person | 1.19 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.9167 ha per person | 2.03 ha per person | 1.11 ha per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, per capita, Angola or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 2.05 ha per person against 0.9322 ha per person in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area, per capita between Angola and South Sudan?
- 1.12 ha per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Angola and South Sudan rank globally for savanna fires — burned area, per capita?
- Angola ranks 4th and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna fires — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.