Chad vs Namibia: Savanna fires — Burned Area, per capita
Chad
0.2322 ha per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.3408 ha per person
in 2024
Chad rank
11th
Namibia rank
9th
Savanna fires — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chad
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.3408 ha per person against 0.2322 ha per person in Chad, a difference of 0.1086 ha per person.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.5 times Chad's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 11th and Namibia ranks 9th of 188 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.13 ha per person | 2.41 ha per person | 1.28 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.8408 ha per person | 2 ha per person | 1.16 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.4672 ha per person | 1.68 ha per person | 1.21 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.3009 ha per person | 0.908 ha per person | 0.6071 ha per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, per capita, Chad or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.3408 ha per person against 0.2322 ha per person in Chad as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area, per capita between Chad and Namibia?
- 0.1086 ha per person, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chad and Namibia rank globally for savanna fires — burned area, per capita?
- Chad ranks 11th and Namibia ranks 9th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna fires — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.