China vs Estonia: Savanna fires — Burned Area, per capita
China
0.0002 ha per person
in 2024
Estonia
0.0002 ha per person
in 2024
China rank
103rd
Estonia rank
102nd
Savanna fires — Burned Area, per capita over time
- China
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.0002 ha per person against 0.0002 ha per person in China, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was China ahead.
China ranks 103rd and Estonia ranks 102nd of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | China |
| 2000s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | China |
| 2020s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, per capita, China or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 0.0002 ha per person against 0.0002 ha per person in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area, per capita between China and Estonia?
- 0 ha per person, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Estonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do China and Estonia rank globally for savanna fires — burned area, per capita?
- China ranks 103rd and Estonia ranks 102nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna fires — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.