Australia vs Eswatini: Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP

Australia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eswatini
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Australia rank
32nd
Eswatini rank
29th

Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time

  • Australia
  • Eswatini
000000199020072024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Australia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 32nd and Eswatini ranks 29th of 185 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP Australia
2000s 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP Australia
2010s 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP Australia
2020s 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, per unit of gdp, Australia or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area, per unit of gdp between Australia and Eswatini?
0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eswatini?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and Eswatini rank globally for savanna fires — burned area, per unit of gdp?
Australia ranks 32nd and Eswatini ranks 29th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Eswatini: Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/eswatini/">Australia vs Eswatini: Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Unit
ha per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Savanna fires — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.