Egypt vs India: Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Egypt
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
India
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Egypt rank
86th
India rank
87th
Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Egypt
- India
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in India, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was India ahead.
Egypt ranks 86th and India ranks 87th of 185 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | India |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | India |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | India |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, per unit of gdp, Egypt or India?
- Egypt, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in India as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area, per unit of gdp between Egypt and India?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and India?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and India rank globally for savanna fires — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Egypt ranks 86th and India ranks 87th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna fires — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.