Libya vs Oman: Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Libya
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Oman
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Libya rank
128th
Oman rank
128th
Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Libya
- Oman
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Oman, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 128th and Oman ranks 128th of 185 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, per unit of gdp, Libya or Oman?
- Libya, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area, per unit of gdp between Libya and Oman?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Oman?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Oman rank globally for savanna fires — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Libya ranks 128th and Oman ranks 128th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna fires — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.