China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Savanna fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
148th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
148th

Savanna fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-1000100200300199120072024

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 148th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 148th of 191 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s -7.86 % change on previous year -16.67 % change on previous year 8.81 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s -100 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), China, Hong Kong SAR or Sao Tome and Principe?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe?
7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 148th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 148th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/sao-tome-and-principe/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
223 places, 6,356 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.