Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Savanna fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Cuba
-48.19 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
-45.08 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cuba rank
112th
Zimbabwe rank
110th

Savanna fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Cuba
  • Zimbabwe
-1000100200300400199120072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -45.08 % change on previous year against -48.19 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 3.11 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Cuba ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s -2.52 % change on previous year 4.19 % change on previous year 6.7 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s 35.28 % change on previous year 4.43 % change on previous year 30.85 % change on previous year Cuba
2010s 10.15 % change on previous year -2.95 % change on previous year 13.1 % change on previous year Cuba
2020s 93.8 % change on previous year 6.02 % change on previous year 87.78 % change on previous year Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Cuba or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -45.08 % change on previous year against -48.19 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
3.11 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Cuba ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
223 places, 6,356 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.