Mauritius vs Norway: Savanna fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Mauritius
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Mauritius rank
148th
Norway rank
148th

Savanna fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Mauritius
  • Norway
-1000100200300400199120052020

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Norway ahead.

Mauritius ranks 148th and Norway ranks 148th of 191 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 36.74 % change on previous year -22.65 % change on previous year 59.39 % change on previous year Mauritius
2000s -100 % change on previous year 14.07 % change on previous year 114.07 % change on previous year Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Mauritius or Norway?
Mauritius, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2015.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Mauritius and Norway?
0 % change on previous year, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?
10 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2007.
How do Mauritius and Norway rank globally for savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Mauritius ranks 148th and Norway ranks 148th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Norway: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/norway/">Mauritius vs Norway: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
223 places, 6,356 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.