Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
295.62 million t
in 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo
195.68 million t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
3rd

Savanna fires — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 295.62 million t against 195.68 million t in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 99.94 million t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.5 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 3rd of 221 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 441.60 million t 157.91 million t 283.70 million t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 516.75 million t 180.40 million t 336.35 million t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 456.55 million t 185.43 million t 271.12 million t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 332.24 million t 188.43 million t 143.82 million t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Australia and New Zealand, at 295.62 million t against 195.68 million t in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
99.94 million t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for savanna fires — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 3rd of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.