Australia and New Zealand vs Non-Annex I countries: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
295.62 million t
in 2024
Non-Annex I countries
1.52 billion t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd
Non-Annex I countries rank
2nd

Savanna fires — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Non-Annex I countries
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199020072024

How they compare

Non-Annex I countries currently reports 1.52 billion t against 295.62 million t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.23 billion t.

That makes Non-Annex I countries's figure about 5.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Non-Annex I countries has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Non-Annex I countries ranks 2nd of 221 countries.

Non-Annex I countries has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Non-Annex I countries Difference Ahead
1990s 441.60 million t 1.69 billion t 1.25 billion t Non-Annex I countries
2000s 516.75 million t 1.79 billion t 1.27 billion t Non-Annex I countries
2010s 456.55 million t 1.62 billion t 1.17 billion t Non-Annex I countries
2020s 332.24 million t 1.53 billion t 1.20 billion t Non-Annex I countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Non-Annex I countries?
Non-Annex I countries, at 1.52 billion t against 295.62 million t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Non-Annex I countries?
1.23 billion t, with Non-Annex I countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Non-Annex I countries?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Non-Annex I countries rank globally for savanna fires — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Non-Annex I countries ranks 2nd of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Non-Annex I countries: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/non-annex-i-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/non-annex-i-countries/">Australia and New Zealand vs Non-Annex I countries: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.