Australia and New Zealand vs Sudan (former): Savanna fires — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
295.62 million t
in 2024
Sudan (former)
191.28 million t
in 2011
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd
Sudan (former) rank
5th

Savanna fires — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Sudan (former)
200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 295.62 million t against 191.28 million t in Sudan (former), a difference of 104.34 million t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.5 times Sudan (former)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Sudan (former) ranks 5th of 221 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Sudan (former) Difference Ahead
1990s 441.60 million t 211.86 million t 229.74 million t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 516.75 million t 208.48 million t 308.27 million t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 541.71 million t 179.33 million t 362.38 million t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Sudan (former)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 295.62 million t against 191.28 million t in Sudan (former) as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Sudan (former)?
104.34 million t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Sudan (former)?
22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Sudan (former) rank globally for savanna fires — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Sudan (former) ranks 5th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Sudan (former): Savanna fires — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/sudan-former/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/sudan-former/">Australia and New Zealand vs Sudan (former): Savanna fires — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.