South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Savanna fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square

South Africa
28.71 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
26.06 t per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
21st
Zimbabwe rank
22nd

Savanna fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
0204060199020062023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 28.71 t per square kilometre against 26.06 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.65 t per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

South Africa ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 188 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 18.61 t per square kilometre 50.25 t per square kilometre 31.64 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 17.28 t per square kilometre 49.65 t per square kilometre 32.37 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 14.64 t per square kilometre 41.87 t per square kilometre 27.23 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 21.03 t per square kilometre 22.55 t per square kilometre 1.52 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), South Africa or Zimbabwe?
South Africa, at 28.71 t per square kilometre against 26.06 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
2.65 t per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
South Africa ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.