Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Savanna fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … unit

Eswatini
0.0001 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0001 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eswatini rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
31st

Savanna fires: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … unit over time

  • Eswatini
  • Zimbabwe
00.0020.0040.006199020072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 185 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP 0.0026 t per US$ of GDP 0.0024 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0.0032 t per US$ of GDP 0.0031 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0.0009 t per US$ of GDP 0.0008 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna fires — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Eswatini ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/zimbabwe/">Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Savanna fires — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.