China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malaysia: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Malaysia
-99.15 % change on previous year
in 2022
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
147th
Malaysia rank
146th

Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Malaysia
02505007501.0k199120072024

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports -99.15 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.85 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Malaysia ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 147th and Malaysia ranks 146th of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.32 % change on previous year 23.85 % change on previous year 22.53 % change on previous year Malaysia
2000s 114.09 % change on previous year 84.45 % change on previous year 29.64 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s -34.22 % change on previous year 47.63 % change on previous year 81.84 % change on previous year Malaysia
2020s -100 % change on previous year -99.15 % change on previous year 0.8499 % change on previous year Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at -99.15 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2022.
What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Malaysia?
0.85 % change on previous year, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Malaysia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Malaysia rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 147th and Malaysia ranks 146th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malaysia: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/malaysia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malaysia: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 6,267 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.