Norway vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Turks and Caicos Islands
-100 % change on previous year
in 2010
Norway rank
147th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
147th
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time
- Norway
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Norway currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
Norway ranks 147th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 147th of 181 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Norway or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Norway, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2020.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Norway and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Norway and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
- Norway ranks 147th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 147th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.