Brunei vs Czechia: Savanna fires — Emissions
Savanna fires — Emissions over time
- Brunei
- Czechia
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Czechia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Brunei ahead.
Brunei ranks 168th and Czechia ranks 168th of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brunei averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0029 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0023 kt | Brunei |
| 2000s | 0.0009 kt | 0.0018 kt | 0.0009 kt | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.0007 kt | 0.0011 kt | 0.0003 kt | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0001 kt | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Brunei or Czechia?
- Brunei, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Brunei and Czechia?
- 0 kt, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Brunei and Czechia rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Brunei ranks 168th and Czechia ranks 168th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf