Brunei vs Sweden: Savanna fires — Emissions
Savanna fires — Emissions over time
- Brunei
- Sweden
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Brunei ranks 168th and Sweden ranks 168th of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brunei averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0026 kt | 0.0034 kt | 0.0009 kt | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.0009 kt | 0.0022 kt | 0.0014 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.0007 kt | 0.0123 kt | 0.0116 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.0005 kt | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Brunei or Sweden?
- Brunei, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Brunei and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Sweden?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Brunei and Sweden rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Brunei ranks 168th and Sweden ranks 168th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf