Jordan vs Libya: Savanna fires — Emissions
Savanna fires — Emissions over time
- Jordan
- Libya
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Jordan ranks 142nd and Libya ranks 142nd of 221 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0086 kt | 0.0073 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.001 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.0008 kt | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0176 kt | 0.0175 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.0013 kt | 0.0035 kt | 0.0022 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Jordan or Libya?
- Jordan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Jordan and Libya?
- 0 kt, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Libya?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Libya rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Jordan ranks 142nd and Libya ranks 142nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf