Libya vs Slovenia: Savanna fires — Emissions
Savanna fires — Emissions over time
- Libya
- Slovenia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovenia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 142nd and Slovenia ranks 142nd of 221 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0086 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.0078 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.0019 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0015 kt | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.0176 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.017 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.0035 kt | 0.0026 kt | 0.0009 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Libya or Slovenia?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Libya and Slovenia?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Slovenia rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Libya ranks 142nd and Slovenia ranks 142nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf