Mali vs Russia: Savanna fires — Emissions
Savanna fires — Emissions over time
- Mali
- Russia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 65.53 kt against 62.74 kt in Russia, a difference of 2.79 kt.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russia ahead.
Mali ranks 17th and Russia ranks 18th of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 86.76 kt | 71.76 kt | 15 kt | Mali |
| 2000s | 82.85 kt | 89.49 kt | 6.64 kt | Russia |
| 2010s | 63.65 kt | 85.92 kt | 22.27 kt | Russia |
| 2020s | 67.53 kt | 86.59 kt | 19.06 kt | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Mali or Russia?
- Mali, at 65.53 kt against 62.74 kt in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Mali and Russia?
- 2.79 kt, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Russia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Russia rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Mali ranks 17th and Russia ranks 18th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf