Panama vs Turkey: Savanna fires — Emissions
Savanna fires — Emissions over time
- Panama
- Turkey
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0.3334 kt against 0.3268 kt in Turkey, a difference of 0.0066 kt.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turkey ahead.
Panama ranks 94th and Turkey ranks 95th of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2514 kt | 1.76 kt | 1.51 kt | Turkey |
| 2000s | 0.5924 kt | 0.4187 kt | 0.1738 kt | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.3983 kt | 0.4491 kt | 0.0508 kt | Turkey |
| 2020s | 0.252 kt | 0.586 kt | 0.3341 kt | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Panama or Turkey?
- Panama, at 0.3334 kt against 0.3268 kt in Turkey as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Panama and Turkey?
- 0.0066 kt, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Turkey?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Turkey rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Panama ranks 94th and Turkey ranks 95th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf