Belarus vs Uruguay: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4)
Belarus
0.0456 kt
in 2024
Uruguay
0.0619 kt
in 2024
Belarus rank
101st
Uruguay rank
98th
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.0619 kt against 0.0456 kt in Belarus, a difference of 0.0163 kt.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Belarus ranks 101st and Uruguay ranks 98th of 221 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0935 kt | 0.1408 kt | 0.0474 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.2228 kt | 0.2731 kt | 0.0502 kt | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.1803 kt | 0.1812 kt | 0.001 kt | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.0937 kt | 0.1804 kt | 0.0867 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Belarus or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.0619 kt against 0.0456 kt in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 0.0163 kt, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 101st and Uruguay ranks 98th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.