Belgium-Luxembourg vs Grenada: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4)
Belgium-Luxembourg
0 kt
in 1999
Grenada
0 kt
in 2024
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
140th
Grenada rank
140th
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Grenada
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Grenada, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 140th and Grenada ranks 140th of 221 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Belgium-Luxembourg or Grenada?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Grenada as of 1999.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Belgium-Luxembourg and Grenada?
- 0 kt, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Grenada?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Grenada rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 140th and Grenada ranks 140th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.