Cuba vs Philippines: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4)
Cuba
1.02 kt
in 2024
Philippines
1.35 kt
in 2024
Cuba rank
65th
Philippines rank
63rd
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Cuba
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 1.35 kt against 1.02 kt in Cuba, a difference of 0.33 kt.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.3 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 65th and Philippines ranks 63rd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7533 kt | 0.5524 kt | 0.2008 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 1.16 kt | 0.8364 kt | 0.3252 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.815 kt | 0.9244 kt | 0.1094 kt | Philippines |
| 2020s | 1.38 kt | 0.7913 kt | 0.5839 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Cuba or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 1.35 kt against 1.02 kt in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Cuba and Philippines?
- 0.33 kt, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Philippines?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Philippines rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 65th and Philippines ranks 63rd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.