Czechia vs Mauritius: Savanna fires — Emissions
Czechia
0.0002 kt
in 2024
Mauritius
0 kt
in 2024
Czechia rank
139th
Mauritius rank
140th
Savanna fires — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0002 kt.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 139th and Mauritius ranks 140th of 221 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.0018 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0016 kt | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.0011 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0009 kt | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.0005 kt | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Czechia or Mauritius?
- Czechia, at 0.0002 kt against 0 kt in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Czechia and Mauritius?
- 0.0002 kt, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Mauritius?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Mauritius rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 139th and Mauritius ranks 140th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.