Ecuador vs Rwanda: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4)
Ecuador
0.8506 kt
in 2024
Rwanda
0.6341 kt
in 2024
Ecuador rank
67th
Rwanda rank
69th
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Ecuador
- Rwanda
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.8506 kt against 0.6341 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0.2165 kt.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Ecuador ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2319 kt | 0.3189 kt | 0.087 kt | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.2555 kt | 0.2611 kt | 0.0056 kt | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.3803 kt | 0.4425 kt | 0.0622 kt | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.5681 kt | 0.5066 kt | 0.0616 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Ecuador or Rwanda?
- Ecuador, at 0.8506 kt against 0.6341 kt in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 0.2165 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.