Gibraltar vs Mauritius: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4)
Gibraltar
0 kt
in 2024
Mauritius
0 kt
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
140th
Mauritius rank
140th
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Gibraltar
- Mauritius
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gibraltar ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 140th and Mauritius ranks 140th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | Gibraltar |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Gibraltar or Mauritius?
- Gibraltar, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Gibraltar and Mauritius?
- 0 kt, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Gibraltar and Mauritius rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Gibraltar ranks 140th and Mauritius ranks 140th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.