Libya vs Sweden: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4)
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
Libya rank
140th
Sweden rank
140th
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Libya
- Sweden
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 140th and Sweden ranks 140th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0086 kt | 0.0034 kt | 0.0051 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.0019 kt | 0.0022 kt | 0.0004 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.0176 kt | 0.0123 kt | 0.0054 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.0028 kt | 0 kt | 0.0028 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Libya or Sweden?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Libya and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Sweden rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Libya ranks 140th and Sweden ranks 140th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.