Mauritius vs Sweden: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4)
Mauritius
0 kt
in 2024
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
Mauritius rank
140th
Sweden rank
140th
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Mauritius
- Sweden
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Mauritius ranks 140th and Sweden ranks 140th of 221 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0034 kt | 0.0032 kt | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0022 kt | 0.002 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0123 kt | 0.0122 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Mauritius or Sweden?
- Mauritius, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Mauritius and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Sweden rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Mauritius ranks 140th and Sweden ranks 140th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.