Oceania vs South Sudan: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4)
Oceania
681.54 kt
in 2024
South Sudan
359.15 kt
in 2024
Oceania rank
9th
South Sudan rank
6th
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Oceania
- South Sudan
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 681.54 kt against 359.15 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 322.39 kt.
That makes Oceania's figure about 1.9 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Oceania ahead.
Oceania ranks 9th and South Sudan ranks 6th of 31 groups.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,004 kt | 365.4 kt | 638.9 kt | Oceania |
| 2020s | 766.15 kt | 332.07 kt | 434.08 kt | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Oceania or South Sudan?
- Oceania, at 681.54 kt against 359.15 kt in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Oceania and South Sudan?
- 322.39 kt, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Oceania and South Sudan rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Oceania ranks 9th and South Sudan ranks 6th of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.