Puerto Rico vs Slovenia: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4)
Puerto Rico
0 kt
in 2024
Slovenia
0 kt
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
140th
Slovenia rank
140th
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Puerto Rico
- Slovenia
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovenia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 140th and Slovenia ranks 140th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 3 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.001 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.0002 kt | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 0.0015 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0009 kt | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 0.0005 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.0016 kt | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Puerto Rico or Slovenia?
- Puerto Rico, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Puerto Rico and Slovenia?
- 0 kt, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Slovenia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Puerto Rico and Slovenia rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Puerto Rico ranks 140th and Slovenia ranks 140th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.