Serbia vs Turkmenistan: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4)
Serbia
0.1547 kt
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0.1303 kt
in 2024
Serbia rank
88th
Turkmenistan rank
89th
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Serbia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.1547 kt against 0.1303 kt in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.0244 kt.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Serbia ranks 88th and Turkmenistan ranks 89th of 221 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0941 kt | 0.6992 kt | 0.6051 kt | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 0.0403 kt | 1.28 kt | 1.24 kt | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 0.0463 kt | 0.6122 kt | 0.5659 kt | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Serbia or Turkmenistan?
- Serbia, at 0.1547 kt against 0.1303 kt in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Serbia and Turkmenistan?
- 0.0244 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turkmenistan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Turkmenistan rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Serbia ranks 88th and Turkmenistan ranks 89th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.